Compiles data on FAR and DFAR along with other advisory information. United States Military Standard - Wikipedia. A United Statesdefense standard, often called a military standard, . Department of Defense. Standardization is beneficial in achieving interoperability, ensuring products meet certain requirements, commonality, reliability, total cost of ownership, compatibility with logistics systems, and similar defense- related objectives . This article discusses definitions, history, and usage of defense standards. Related documents, such as defense handbooks and defense specifications, are also addressed. Definition of document types. Strictly speaking, these documents serve different purposes. According to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), military specifications . The GAO acknowledges, however, that the terms are often used interchangeably. 3A - 3-A Sanitary Standards 3-A SSI develops and maintains a comprehensive inventory of Sanitary Standards and Accepted Practices for dairy and food processing. NIST's computer security publications (FIPS, Special Pubs, and NISTIRs) that have been published as drafts, inviting public comments. A United States defense standard, often called a military standard, "MIL-STD", "MIL-SPEC", or (informally) "MilSpecs", is used to help achieve standardization. Cultivating Trust in IT and Metrology through measurements, standards and testing. MIL-STD-498 (PDF version) Foreword Page ii FOREWORD 1. This Military Standard is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of Defense. Official definitions are provided by Do. D 4. 12. 0. 2. 4- M, . MIL- STD- 9. 67 covers the content and format for defense handbooks. MIL- SPECDefense Specification. A document that describes the essential technical requirements for purchased materiel that is military unique or substantially modified commercial items. MIL- STD- 9. 61 covers the content and format for defense specifications. MIL- STDDefense Standard. A document that establishes uniform engineering and technical requirements for military- unique or substantially modified commercial processes, procedures, practices, and methods. There are five types of defense standards: interface standards, design criteria standards, manufacturing process standards, standard practices, and test method standards. MIL- STD- 9. 62 covers the content and format for defense standards. MIL- PRFPerformance Specification. A performance specification states requirements in terms of the required results with criteria for verifying compliance, but without stating the methods for achieving the required results. A performance specification defines the functional requirements for the item, the environment in which it must operate, and interface and interchangeability characteristics. MIL- DTLDetail Specification. A specification that specifies design requirements, such as materials to be used, how a requirement is to be achieved, or how an item is to be fabricated or constructed. A specification that contains both performance and detail requirements is still considered a detail specification. For purposes of this article, . The latter two goals (MRO and logistics) favor certain general concepts, such as interchangeability, standardization (of equipment and processes, in general), cataloguing, communications, and training (to teach people what is standardized, what is at their discretion, and the details of the standards). DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02 http:// 3:33:35 PM Write secure C and C++ codeāand avoid the software defects most likely to cause exploitable vulnerabilities. Secure Coding in C and C++ (2nd Edition) identifies the. In the late 1. 8th century and throughout the 1. American and French militaries were early adopters and longtime developmental sponsors and advocates of interchangeability and standardization. By World War II (1. Allied Forces, Axis powers) were busy standardizing and cataloguing. AN- cataloguing system (Army- Navy) and the British Defence Standards (DEF- STAN) provide examples. For example, due to differences in dimensional tolerances, in World War II American screws, bolts, and nuts did not fit British equipment properly and were not fully interchangeable. This results, for example, in ammunition and food cases that can be opened without tools; vehicle subsystems that can be quickly swapped into the place of damaged ones; and small arms and artillery that are less likely to find themselves with an excess of ammunition that does not fit and a lack of ammo that does. However, the proliferation of standards also has some drawbacks. The main one is that they impose what is functionally equivalent to a regulatory burden upon the defense supply chain, both within the military and across its civilian suppliers. Almost nothing can be done according to sound case- by- case judgment, and almost everything requires constant, extensive study of the rules and verification that they are being followed . Workflows frequently pause (causing snowballing schedule delays) for reasons that are sometimes essentially trivial, and unit costs rise. In the U. S. Responding to increasing criticism, Secretary of Defense William Perry issued a memorandum in 1. Many defense standards were canceled. In their place, the DOD encouraged the use of industry standards, such as ISO 9. COTS), SAE standards such as the AS and AMS series (e. AS9. 10. 0, AMS 2. Weapon systems were required to use . In 2. 00. 5 the DOD issued a new memorandum. The 2. 00. 5 memo did not reinstate any canceled defense standards. According to a 2. Gateway, published by the Human Systems Information Analysis Center . However, other sources noted that the number of standards just before the Perry memorandum was issued was less than 3. This may be due to differences in what is counted as a . If an enemy discovers a drawback in a standardized system, the system's uniformity leaves it vulnerable to complete incapacitation via what might otherwise have been a limited compromise. Also, if standardization promotes use by allies, it may also ease an enemy's task of using materiel that is lost as a prize of war. However, this threat is somewhat academic, as even poorly standardized materiel presents a likelihood of supplying an enemy if overrun. Non- exhaustive list of documents. Though similar, fasteners could often not be interchanged in high- precision, demanding applications until the development of the Unified Thread Standard in the late 1. Community. Browser. SECDEF Memo Specifications & Standards - A New Way of Doing Business, DTD 2. Jun 9. 4^Elimination of Waivers to Cite Military Specifications and Standards . Everyspec. com. US Government. Retrieved 4 January 2. Everyspec. com. US Government. Retrieved 4 January 2. Washington, DC: US Government (published 1. June 2. 01. 4). Retrieved 6 January 2. Further reading. Searle, and Caisse Vickery, (1. Kratz, Louis A., (2. General Accounting Office, (1. Acquisition Reform: DOD Begins Program to Reform Specifications and Standards, Report to Congressional Committees, October, GAO/NSIAD- 9. U. S. Department of Defense, (2. MILSPEC Reform Final Report - An Ending: A New Beginning, April, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology & Logistics), Defense Standardization Office. Opstal, Debra, (1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |